How Europe was colonized

Reflections on how Europe was colonized

The colonization of Europe has a long history, dating back to the aftermath of the Second World War, when global power dynamics were reconfigured. It is important to recognize that colonizers are not typically affiliated with a single country; they often operate across multiple countries and even continents. These colonizers thrive when the local government chooses to ignore their presence, and they are compensated handsomely for their role in the exploitation. While tensions between the Western and Eastern Blocs offered some respite, the global elite was relentless in their pursuit of resources and territorial expansion.

Contemporary capitalism, predicated on continuous economic growth, faces an inherent contradiction: it operates within the finite limits of our planet. This fundamental disconnect forces businesses relentlessly pursuing expansion to confront a stark dilemma: either cannibalize existing markets or seek untapped resources and consumer bases.

Initially, they opted for self-consumption due to the resistance faced from indigenous populations in many countries who did not want to be colonized. Over the past two decades, we have witnessed a surge in self-consumption, whereby larger corporations devour smaller ones as the norm. Unfortunately, this resulted in the demise of small yet high-quality businesses, without any tangible benefits. The products they acquired deteriorated as they hoped to exploit the ready-made business and reap financial gains without making any improvements. Their lack of interest in improvement evidently reduced the overall quality.The latest example is the death of Skype

A predatory acquisition frenzy ensued, with large corporations vying to absorb smaller companies. These established giants, often bereft of innovative vision and driven solely by profit, resorted to appropriating ideas – a practice exemplified by companies like Google. However, even this exploitative strategy eventually reached its limits. Recognizing the unsustainability of internal cannibalization, these corporations turned their gaze outward, towards the untapped potential of developing nations, often referred to as the “East.” These regions offered not only a wealth of natural resources but also a vast reservoir of intellectual capital and cultural richness. Undoubtedly, numerous strategies were devised to facilitate this new wave of economic expansion.

Strategy A involved consolidating power by acquiring control over local governance and establishing spheres of influence reminiscent of feudal systems. This was achieved through the installation and support of puppet regimes, whose primary function was to advance the interests of multinational corporations. A key component of this strategy was reshaping the education system to cultivate a consumerist culture susceptible to financial manipulation.

Control over media outlets, news dissemination, and vital resources like pension and healthcare funds further solidified their influence. Even the executive branch of government was manipulated to serve their agenda. This strategy proved effective for a considerable time. However, its foundations began to crumble as public awareness of its exploitative nature grew. Initial attempts to counteract this strategy through electoral processes proved largely ineffective due to the entrenched mechanisms of manipulation. As a result, a growing wave of resentment is now sweeping through regions still bearing the scars of colonialism, directed towards the nations perpetuating these neocolonial practices.

Strategy B: Coercive Measures. When influence campaigns and cooperative local leaders prove insufficient to advance corporate objectives, the use of force may be considered. This typically involves maintaining a visible military presence in the target region, ostensibly to project power and ensure compliance. However, such deployments require justification, especially in the absence of a credible security threat. Therefore, a manufactured pretext, a fabricated menace, is often propagated to rationalize the continued presence of occupying forces. This contrived threat serves as a constant justification for military intervention, much like a scarecrow is used to deter unwanted intrusions, despite posing no real danger itself.

The media and education systems are exploited for this purpose. Nevertheless, people have become aware of this ploy, and in certain locations, direct conflicts and real wars have been unavoidable. Situations spiraled out of control, prompting the need to illustrate that such a threat still persists. In order to keep the corporate hands clean of war, they always employ intermediaries – other countries whose governments they fund.

They have even grown so callous that they burden local populations with the financial costs of wars they did not instigate. Unfortunately for them, people have deciphered the underlying scheme of this plan, and they are now demanding accountability from these puppets, with some even successfully overthrowing them. Consequently, the globalists find themselves in a state of panic. They are now forced to activate Strategy C, which had been designated as a backup strategy.

Strategy C – Leveraging Internet technologies in the ongoing battle for global dominance. Although this approach is not new and has been utilized for over two decades, its implementation had to be expedited due to the diminishing effectiveness of plans A and B. Plan C has primarily supported plan B, particularly in the realm of propaganda. However, people have lost faith in their own media, necessitating the acceleration of this process.

The pivotal role of AI and The Cloud Computing has been established, given its anonymity and absence of physical manifestation. Consequently, the widespread integration of AI became imperative. Through AI, the occupiers now have access to even the most minute entities and individuals, which is undeniably advantageous for their objectives. Presently, society exhibits mild signs of concern, prompting the occupiers to persevere and allocate substantial resources for further development. The dissemination of propaganda proclaiming AI as a means to assist humanity has gained significant traction, even though there are growing realizations, including admissions from Facebook, regarding its utilization for censorship and manipulation.

People are beginning to comprehend that the advancements in AI are not attributable to its own unique qualities, but rather to the theft and interpretation of individuals’ knowledge. One can only hope that legal battles do not arise concerning the copyright of the information appropriated by AI, as it constitutes outright theft. However, capturing the perpetrator, who lacks a physical address and identity, may prove exceedingly challenging. In the present moment, it appears that the top priority for the occupiers is the swift implementation of AI. Considering the immense investments in this domain, it is evident that globalists are desperate to maintain their grip on the world they have seized.

It is not surprising to consider the possibility of the existence of a strategy D. The global “elite”, who can be seen as parasites, are unlikely to relinquish their power easily. They have become accustomed to living off the labor of society, but now that society has become less essential to them, they are growing increasingly concerned.

Their gatherings in Davos, which often revolve around indulging in pleasure, reveal their deep worries. Resisting their system will not be simple, as they will utilize every means necessary to ensure their survival. They are even prepared to engage in wars, as they view human life as nothing more than a commodity, priced by the kilogram. Recent conflicts have only served to underscore this point. However, it is our responsibility to recognize them locally and refuse to support them. If we choose to completely exclude them from our lives, our efforts would be even more impactful.

____________________________________________________________________________